Fiat Brava 1998 vs Nissan Almera 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 105 HP | 90 - 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 113 - 200 NM | 128 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 15.1 seconds | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.2 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Fiat Brava petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, Fiat Brava equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Fiat Brava is larger, but slightly lower. Fiat Brava is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 3 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Brava is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
775 litres | 1100 litres | |
| Fiat Brava has 25 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 325 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`662 | ~ 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Brava has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |