Fiat 500 2011 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Fiat 500 is more dynamic to drive. Fiat 500 engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Fiat 500 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat 500 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that by driving the Fiat 500 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat 500 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat 500 is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Citigo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat 500 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Fiat 500 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat 500 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo, which means Fiat 500 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat 500 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat 500 has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |