Fiat 500 2015 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Fiat 500 is more dynamic to drive. Fiat 500 engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Fiat 500 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.1 | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat 500 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat 500 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.57 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat 500 and Skoda Citigo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Fiat 500 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Fiat 500 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Fiat 500 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat 500 has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |