Fiat 500 2015 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Fiat 500 engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Fiat 500 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat 500 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat 500 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat 500 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Panda, Fiat Punto | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat 500 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.57 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Fiat 500 is smaller. Fiat 500 is 22 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat 500 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Fiat 500 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat 500 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`305 kg | 1`340 kg | |
| Net weight: | 865 kg | 845 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 440 kg | 495 kg | |
| Fiat 500 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Therefore, Mitsubishi Space Star is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat 500 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |