Fiat 500 2015 vs Skoda Citigo 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
|
Fiat 500 is more dynamic to drive. Fiat 500 engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Fiat 500 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat 500 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat 500 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that by driving the Fiat 500 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat 500 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat 500 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.57 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat 500 and Skoda Citigo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
610 litres | 959 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Fiat 500 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 349 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat 500 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo, which means Fiat 500 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`380 kg | 1`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`005 kg | 857 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 375 kg | 443 kg | |
| Fiat 500 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Skoda Citigo. Therefore, Skoda Citigo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Fiat 500 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Fiat 500 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat 500 has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |