Fiat 500 2015 vs Skoda Citigo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat 500 is more dynamic to drive. Fiat 500 engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Fiat 500 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat 500 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat 500 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat 500 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.57 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat 500 and Skoda Citigo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 185 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 959 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Fiat 500 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat 500 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo, which means Fiat 500 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`290 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Fiat 500 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Fiat 500 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat 500 has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |