Fiat 500 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Fiat 500
2012 - 2015
Nissan Micra
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 0.9 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)1.2 (petrol)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Fiat 500 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 85 - 105 HP80 - 98 HP
Torque: 127 - 320 NM110 - 142 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 - 15.1 seconds11.3 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.0 - 6.24.1 - 5.4
Fiat 500 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.15 m3.78 m
Width: 1.78 m1.67 m
Height: 1.66 m1.52 m
Fiat 500 is larger.
Fiat 500 is 37 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 12 cm wider, while the height of Fiat 500 is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 343 litres265 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
550 litres1132 litres
Fiat 500 has 78 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 582 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters9.3 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat 500 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Fiat 500 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`370 kg~ 1`454 kg
Net weight:~ 947 kg~ 968 kg
Load capacity:~ 423 kg~ 486 kg
Fiat 500 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Nissan Micra. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Nissan Micra scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Micra scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 92004000
Pros and Cons: Fiat 500 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Nissan Micra has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv