Fiat 500 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 105 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 320 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 15.1 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.2 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Fiat 500 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Fiat 500 is larger. Fiat 500 is 37 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 12 cm wider, while the height of Fiat 500 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 343 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1132 litres | |
|
Fiat 500 has more luggage capacity. Fiat 500 has 78 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat 500 is 1.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Fiat 500 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Micra scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Micra scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat 500 has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |