Dodge Stealth 1992 vs Ford Probe 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 164 HP | |
| Torque: | 427 NM | 212 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Stealth engine produces 156 HP more power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 215 NM more than Ford Probe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.1 | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Stealth consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Stealth could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Dodge Stealth gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.25 m | 1.32 m | |
| Dodge Stealth is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Stealth is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Stealth has
|
Ford Probe has
| |