Dodge Stealth 1990 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 166 HP | 286 HP | |
Torque: | 251 NM | 407 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
Dodge Stealth engine produces 120 HP less power than Mitsubishi 3000 GT, whereas torque is 156 NM less than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.4 | |
The Dodge Stealth is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Stealth consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means that by driving the Dodge Stealth over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Dodge Stealth gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.25 m | 1.28 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Stealth is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, width is practically the same , while the height of Dodge Stealth is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 25 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Stealth has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |