Dodge Stealth 1990 vs Nissan 200 SX 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Dodge Stealth is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 - 320 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 - 427 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 12.6 | 9.1 | |
|
Dodge Stealth petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.25 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Dodge Stealth is larger, but lower. Dodge Stealth is 3 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 15 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Stealth is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
| Dodge Stealth has 5 litres less trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Stealth has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |