Dodge RAM 2009 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 552 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge RAM engine produces 215 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 122 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 75 litres | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 229 mm (9 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dodge RAM can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge RAM engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Durango, Dodge Charger | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge RAM might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge RAM engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.82 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Dodge RAM is larger. Dodge RAM is 52 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 20 cm wider, while the height of Dodge RAM is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 200 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge RAM has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |