Dodge RAM 2009 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge RAM) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 552 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Dodge RAM engine produces 246 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 177 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.82 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Dodge RAM is larger. Dodge RAM is 46 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 17 cm wider, while the height of Dodge RAM is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`144 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 600 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge RAM has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |