Dodge RAM 2009 vs Kia Optima 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dodge RAM is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.7 - 5.7 | 1.8 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 212 - 396 HP | 134 - 181 HP | |
Torque: | 319 - 552 NM | 169 - 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.1 - 10.4 | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.82 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 2.02 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.92 m | 1.41 m | |
Dodge RAM is larger. Dodge RAM is 109 cm longer than the Kia Optima, 20 cm wider, while the height of Dodge RAM is 51 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`903 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 38 200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge RAM has
|
| |