Dodge RAM 2009 vs Kia Optima 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Dodge RAM
2009 -
Kia Optima
2000 - 2005
Body: Crossover / SUVSedan
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Dodge RAM is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 3.7 - 5.71.8 - 2.7

Performance

Power: 212 - 396 HP134 - 181 HP
Torque: 319 - 552 NM169 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.5 - 10.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data9.1 - 10.4

Dimensions

Length: 5.82 m4.73 m
Width: 2.02 m1.82 m
Height: 1.92 m1.41 m
Dodge RAM is larger.
Dodge RAM is 109 cm longer than the Kia Optima, 20 cm wider, while the height of Dodge RAM is 51 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data479 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 1`903
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 39 600no data
Pros and Cons: Dodge RAM has
  • available with 4x4 drive
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv