Dodge Nitro 2007 vs BMW X3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Nitro engine produces 13 HP less power than BMW X3, but torque is 64 NM more than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Dodge Nitro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Nitro consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Nitro could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Nitro consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Nitro engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Nitro might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2006 2.5 engine: On this engine, the valve seals and crankcase breather valve diaphragm tend to fail after 80-100 000 km, leading to increased oil consumption. It is recommended to choose engines manufactured in the last years ... More about BMW X3 2006 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Dodge Nitro is larger. Dodge Nitro is 1 cm longer than the BMW X3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Nitro is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1994 litres | 1560 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Nitro has 111 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Dodge Nitro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Nitro (by 434 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Nitro is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Dodge Nitro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Nitro has
|
BMW X3 has
| |