Dodge Nitro 2007 vs Opel Antara 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Dodge Nitro engine produces 27 HP more power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Opel Antara. Despite the higher power, Dodge Nitro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Antara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Nitro consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Nitro could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Nitro consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Antara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Nitro might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Dodge Nitro and Opel Antara are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1994 litres | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Nitro is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Dodge Nitro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`520 kg | 2`225 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`940 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 580 kg | 420 kg | |
| Dodge Nitro load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Opel Antara. Therefore, Dodge Nitro is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Nitro has
|
Opel Antara has
| |