Dodge Nitro 2007 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006

 
Dodge Nitro
2007 - 2010
Chevrolet Captiva
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 177 HP150 HP
Torque: 460 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds12.2 seconds
Dodge Nitro is more dynamic to drive.
Dodge Nitro engine produces 27 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Dodge Nitro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.7
Real fuel consumption: 10.6 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Dodge Nitro consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Nitro could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Nitro consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway890 km on highway
660 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 210 mm (8.3 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Dodge Nitro can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km530'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Jeep WranglerInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Nitro might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.64 m
Width: 1.86 m1.85 m
Height: 1.77 m1.72 m
Dodge Nitro is 6 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Nitro is 5 cm higher.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 369 litres465 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data465 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 369 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1994 litres930 litres
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 96 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Nitro (by 1064 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Nitro is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Dodge Nitro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`520 kg2`505 kg
Net weight:1`940 kg1`790 kg
Load capacity:580 kg715 kg
Dodge Nitro load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Chevrolet Captiva. Therefore, Chevrolet Captiva is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 54003200
Pros and Cons: Dodge Nitro has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv