Dodge Nitro 2007 vs BMW X3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Nitro engine produces 41 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Dodge Nitro reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Nitro consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Nitro could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Nitro consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Nitro might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X3 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Dodge Nitro is larger. Dodge Nitro is 1 cm longer than the BMW X3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Nitro is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 369 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1994 litres | 1560 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Nitro has 111 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Dodge Nitro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Nitro (by 434 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Nitro is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Dodge Nitro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Nitro has
|
BMW X3 has
| |