Dodge Neon 2003 vs Ford Sierra 1987
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Dodge Neon is more dynamic to drive. Dodge Neon engine produces 47 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power Dodge Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Dodge Neon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Neon is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Neon is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Neon has
|
| |