Dodge Neon 2000 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Neon engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Eclipse, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi Eclipse. Due to the lower power, Dodge Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.7 | |
|
The Dodge Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Neon consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means that by driving the Dodge Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.30 m | |
| Dodge Neon is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Neon is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 241 litres | |
|
Dodge Neon has more luggage capacity. Dodge Neon has 130 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Neon has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |