Dodge Neon 2000 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Neon engine produces 34 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Dodge Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.0 | |
|
The Dodge Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Neon consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Dodge Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Dodge Neon is smaller. Dodge Neon is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Neon is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Dodge Neon has 156 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Neon has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |