Dodge Neon 2000 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 157 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Neon engine produces 27 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Dodge Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.7 | |
Dodge Neon consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Dodge Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
Dodge Neon is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Neon is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |