Dodge Neon 2000 vs Nissan Sentra 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 127 HP | |
Torque: | 157 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Dodge Neon engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan Sentra, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Nissan Sentra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.7 | |
Dodge Neon consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Sentra, which means that by driving the Dodge Neon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
Dodge Neon is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan Sentra, width is practically the same , while the height of Dodge Neon is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 329 litres | |
Dodge Neon has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dodge Neon has 42 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Sentra. The Nissan Sentra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Neon has
|
Nissan Sentra has
| |