Dodge Neon 2000 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Dodge Neon is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 215 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 172 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 - 11 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 10.8 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, the Dodge Neon petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
| Dodge Neon is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Neon is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`573 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Neon has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |