Dodge Neon 2000 vs Suzuki Liana 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dodge Neon is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Liana can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 215 HP | 90 - 103 HP | |
Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 116 - 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 - 11 seconds | 12 - 13.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 10.8 | 7.0 - 7.7 | |
Dodge Neon petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Liana. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
Dodge Neon is larger, but lower. Dodge Neon is 8 cm longer than the Suzuki Liana, 2 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Neon is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 480 litres | |
Suzuki Liana has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Neon has 109 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Liana. This could mean that the Dodge Neon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`573 | ~ 1`653 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |