Dodge Magnum 2003 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 345 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 NM | 536 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Magnum engine produces 30 HP less power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Magnum is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2013 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Magnum has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dodge Magnum has 1557 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Magnum has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |