Dodge Magnum 2003 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Magnum and Dodge Charger have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.7 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Magnum consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Magnum could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Magnum is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2013 litres | 456 litres | |
|
Dodge Magnum has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dodge Magnum has 1557 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Magnum has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |