Dodge Magnum 2003 vs Honda Accord 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Magnum engine produces 3 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Honda Accord. Despite the higher power, Dodge Magnum reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.0 | |
| Dodge Magnum consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Dodge Magnum over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Accord) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Dodge Magnum) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Magnum engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Intrepid | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Magnum might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Dodge Magnum engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Dodge Magnum is larger. Dodge Magnum is 27 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 12 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Magnum is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2013 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1657 litres | |
|
Dodge Magnum has more luggage capacity. Dodge Magnum has 1441 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Magnum has
|
Honda Accord has
| |