Dodge Magnum 2003 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 258 NM | 257 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Dodge Magnum is more dynamic to drive. Dodge Magnum and Chrysler 300C have the same engine power, but Dodge Magnum torque is 1 NM more than Chrysler 300C. Dodge Magnum reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.0 | |
Dodge Magnum consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Dodge Magnum over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.56 m | |
Dodge Magnum is larger, but lower. Dodge Magnum and Chrysler 300C are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 2013 litres | 630 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1602 litres | |
Dodge Magnum has more luggage capacity. Dodge Magnum has 1383 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`225 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Magnum has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |