Dodge Magnum 2003 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.0 (petrol) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 570 NM | 257 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 10.7 seconds | 5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 14.6 | 8.3 - 14.0 | |
|
Dodge Magnum petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Dodge Magnum is larger, but lower. Dodge Magnum is 1 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Dodge Magnum is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2013 litres | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1602 litres | |
|
Dodge Magnum has more luggage capacity. Dodge Magnum has 1383 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Magnum is 1.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Dodge Magnum can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`334 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Magnum has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |