Dodge Magnum 2003 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.0 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 570 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 10.7 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 14.6 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Dodge Magnum petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Magnum is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2013 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Dodge Magnum has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dodge Magnum has 1553 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Magnum is 1.6 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger, which means Dodge Magnum can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Magnum has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |