Dodge Journey 2011 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 147 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.8 | |
| Dodge Journey consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Journey could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Dodge Journey is smaller. Dodge Journey is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1915 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Dodge Journey has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`381 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |