Dodge Journey 2011 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.2 | |
|
The Dodge Journey is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Journey consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Dodge Journey over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Dodge Journey is smaller. Dodge Journey is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 663 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1915 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Dodge Journey has 363 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`381 kg | 2`810 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |