Dodge Journey 2011 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Journey) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 148 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 90 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Dodge Journey is smaller. Dodge Journey is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`381 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |