Dodge Journey 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 17 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 5 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Journey consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Journey could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Dodge Journey is larger. Dodge Journey is 34 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1915 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Dodge Journey uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Journey (by 246 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`381 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |