Dodge Journey 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Journey) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 67 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 275 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Journey consumes 5.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Journey could require 810 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Journey engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Dodge Journey is 9 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1915 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Dodge Journey uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`381 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 35 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |