Dodge Journey 2011 vs Land Rover Discovery 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 167 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 225 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.5 | |
| Dodge Journey consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Dodge Journey over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
|
Land Rover Discovery 2016: All wheels are powered permanently, has a center differential. Full time 4WD can be used both on and off road. Transfer cases in most have two modes (low and high), which allows the use of low speed range in harsh conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Discovery can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Dodge Journey is smaller. Dodge Journey is 8 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 24 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 1231 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1915 litres | 2406 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage space. Dodge Journey has 931 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 491 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Dodge Journey can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`381 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |