Dodge Journey 2011 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Dodge Journey) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jaguar F-Pace) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 7 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 205 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 5.3 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Journey consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Journey could require 885 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
| Dodge Journey is 16 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Pace, 24 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1915 litres | 650 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Dodge Journey uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Journey (by 1265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Dodge Journey can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`381 kg | 2`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`845 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 646 kg | 615 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |