Dodge Journey 2011 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 6 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 5 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Journey consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Journey could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Malibu | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
| Dodge Journey is 22 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 300 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1915 litres | 1577 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 177 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Journey (by 338 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Dodge Journey can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`381 kg | 2`329 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`793 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 646 kg | 536 kg | |
| Dodge Journey load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Chevrolet Captiva. Therefore, Dodge Journey is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |