Dodge Journey 2008 vs Nissan Murano 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 256 NM | 334 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Nissan Murano is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Journey engine produces 64 HP less power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Nissan Murano. Due to the lower power, Dodge Journey reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.9 | |
The Dodge Journey is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Journey consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Dodge Journey over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 82 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
Dodge Journey is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 6 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 127 litres | 402 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 127 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 816 litres | 402 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2117 litres | no data | |
In 5-seat version Dodge Journey has more luggage space (by 414 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`425 | 2`380 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |