Dodge Journey 2008 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Dodge Journey engine produces 50 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Dodge Journey reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Journey is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Journey consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Dodge Journey over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Journey consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 77 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Journey gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Journey engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Dodge Journey is 10 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Journey is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 127 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 127 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 816 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2117 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Journey is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`480 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Journey has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |