Dodge Intrepid 2002 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Intrepid engine produces 4 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Dodge Intrepid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.7 | |
| Dodge Intrepid consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Dodge Intrepid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Dodge Intrepid is 18 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | 2`120 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |