Dodge Intrepid 2002 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 278 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Dodge Intrepid is more dynamic to drive. Dodge Intrepid engine produces 73 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. Thanks to more power Dodge Intrepid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.2 | |
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Intrepid consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Intrepid could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
700 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.18 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Dodge Intrepid is larger, but slightly lower. Dodge Intrepid is 10 cm longer than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Intrepid is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 525 litres | |
Dodge Intrepid has 5 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |