Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2003
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Dodge Intrepid engine produces 35 HP less power than Chrysler Pacifica, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 87 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.12 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.69 m | |
| Dodge Intrepid is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler Pacifica, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Intrepid is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 369 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 369 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 473 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |