Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Dodge Intrepid engine produces 14 HP less power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 65 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.12 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Dodge Intrepid is larger, but slightly lower. Dodge Intrepid is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Intrepid is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 525 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Intrepid has 52 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. This could mean that the Dodge Intrepid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |