Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 228 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Dodge Intrepid is more dynamic to drive. Dodge Intrepid and Chrysler Concorde have the same engine power, but Dodge Intrepid torque is 4 NM more than Chrysler Concorde. Dodge Intrepid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.3 | |
|
The Dodge Intrepid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Intrepid consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that by driving the Dodge Intrepid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Dodge Intrepid is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
| Dodge Intrepid has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Concorde. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
| |