Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Dodge Intrepid engine produces 26 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Despite less power, Dodge Intrepid reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.7 | |
|
The Dodge Intrepid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Intrepid consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Dodge Intrepid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Intrepid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Dodge Intrepid is 18 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Intrepid has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. This could mean that the Dodge Intrepid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |