Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 228 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Concorde is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Intrepid engine produces 25 HP less power than Chrysler Concorde, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Chrysler Concorde. Due to the lower power, Dodge Intrepid reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.3 | |
|
The Dodge Intrepid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Intrepid consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that by driving the Dodge Intrepid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Intrepid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Dodge Intrepid is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
| Dodge Intrepid has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Concorde. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |