Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 254 HP | |
Torque: | 258 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Intrepid engine produces 51 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, Dodge Intrepid reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.7 | |
The Dodge Intrepid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Intrepid consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Dodge Intrepid over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Dodge Intrepid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.18 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Dodge Intrepid is 18 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Dodge Intrepid has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. This could mean that the Dodge Intrepid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`120 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |