Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 250 HP | 203 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 340 NM | 256 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | 8.8 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.6 | 10.5 - 10.7 | |
|
Dodge Intrepid petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300M. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Dodge Intrepid is 16 cm longer than the Chrysler 300M, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Dodge Intrepid has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. This could mean that the Dodge Intrepid uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`070 | ~ 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Intrepid has
|
| |