Dodge Intrepid 1997 vs Chevrolet Impala 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 3.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 250 HP | 177 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 340 NM | 278 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | 7 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 10.6 | 9.2 - 10.2 | |
|
Dodge Intrepid petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Dodge Intrepid is larger, but slightly lower. Dodge Intrepid is 8 cm longer than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Intrepid is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 525 litres | |
| Dodge Intrepid has 5 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`070 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |